What is DS-Lite (Dual-Stack Lite)?
Table of Contents
Introduction: Solving IPv4 Exhaustion with IPv6 Infrastructure
Dual-Stack Lite (DS-Lite) is an IPv6 transition technology designed to solve a critical problem facing Internet Service Providers: how to provide IPv4 connectivity to customers when IPv4 addresses have been exhausted, while simultaneously deploying IPv6 infrastructure.
Standardized in RFC 6333 (August 2011), DS-Lite enables ISPs to operate an IPv6-only core network while still delivering IPv4 services to subscribers. This hybrid approach allows providers to:
- Conserve scarce IPv4 addresses through address sharing
- Eliminate IPv4 infrastructure from the access and core network
- Future-proof the network by building on IPv6 as the primary protocol
- Avoid dual-stack complexity at the network core
The technology has been widely deployed by ISPs worldwide, particularly in regions where IPv4 address exhaustion hit hardest and where greenfield fiber deployments made IPv6-only infrastructure attractive.
DS-Lite Architecture Overview
DS-Lite consists of two fundamental components working together to bridge IPv4 applications over an IPv6 network:
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ DS-Lite Architecture │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Customer Network ISP Network Internet
┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────────┐ ┌──────────┐
│ End User │ │ IPv6-Only │ │ IPv4 │
│ Devices │ │ Core Network │ │ Internet │
│ │ │ │ │ │
│ ┌────────┐ │ │ │ │ │
│ │ IPv4 │ │ │ │ │ │
│ │ App │ │ IPv4 │ IPv4-in-IPv6 │ IPv4 │ │
│ └───┬────┘ │ Packet │ Tunnel │ Packet │ │
│ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │
│ ┌───▼────┐ │ │ │ ┌───▼─────┐ │ │ │ │
│ │ B4 │──┼───┴────────┼───▶│ AFTR │──┼───┴───▶│ │
│ │Element │ │ │ │ (CGN + │ │ │ │
│ │ (CPE) │ │◀───────────┼────│Tunnel │◀─┼────────│ │
│ └────────┘ │ │ │Endpoint)│ │ │ │
│ │ │ └─────────┘ │ │ │
└──────────────┘ └──────────────────┘ └──────────┘
Private IPv4 Native IPv6 Public IPv4
RFC 1918 2001:db8::/32 Shared via NAT
Component Overview
B4 (Basic Bridging BroadBand) Element
- Located at the customer premises (CPE/router)
- Encapsulates IPv4 packets into IPv6
- Creates the client side of the IPv4-in-IPv6 tunnel
- Receives IPv6 connectivity from the ISP
AFTR (Address Family Transition Router)
- Located in the ISP's network core
- Terminates IPv4-in-IPv6 tunnels from multiple B4 elements
- Performs carrier-grade NAT44 (CGNAT)
- Routes IPv4 traffic to/from the public Internet
- Shared by hundreds or thousands of subscribers
IPv6-Only Access Network
- No IPv4 addressing required between customer and AFTR
- Simplified infrastructure (single protocol stack)
- All transport uses native IPv6
How DS-Lite Works: IPv4-in-IPv6 Tunneling
DS-Lite's core mechanism is IPv4-in-IPv6 encapsulation, allowing IPv4 packets to traverse an IPv6-only network without modification.
Packet Flow: Outbound (Customer to Internet)
Step 1: IPv4 Application to B4
Original IPv4 Packet:
┌────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ IPv4 Header │
│ Source: 192.168.1.100 (private) │
│ Dest: 93.184.216.34 (example.com) │
├────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ TCP/UDP Data (HTTP request, etc.) │
└────────────────────────────────────────┘
Step 2: B4 Encapsulates in IPv6
Encapsulated Packet:
┌────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ IPv6 Header │
│ Source: 2001:db8:1234::1 (B4 address) │
│ Dest: 2001:db8:aftr::1 (AFTR addr) │
│ Next Header: 4 (IPv4) │
├────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ ┌────────────────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ IPv4 Header (original) │ │
│ │ Source: 192.168.1.100 │ │
│ │ Dest: 93.184.216.34 │ │
│ ├────────────────────────────────────┤ │
│ │ TCP/UDP Data │ │
│ └────────────────────────────────────┘ │
└────────────────────────────────────────┘
Step 3: IPv6 Network Transport
The packet travels through the ISP's IPv6-only network using standard IPv6 routing. No IPv4 infrastructure is required in the access or core network.
Step 4: AFTR Decapsulates and NATs
AFTR Processing:
1. Receives IPv6 packet
2. Extracts inner IPv4 packet
3. Performs NAT44 translation:
- Source: 192.168.1.100 → 203.0.113.5:12345 (public IP:port)
- Dest: 93.184.216.34 (unchanged)
4. Forwards to IPv4 Internet
Step 5: Internet Response
Return traffic follows the reverse path:
- Internet responds to 203.0.113.5:12345
- AFTR translates back to tunnel endpoint
- AFTR encapsulates in IPv6 to B4's IPv6 address
- B4 decapsulates and delivers to 192.168.1.100
Tunneling Protocol Details
DS-Lite uses IPv4-in-IPv6 encapsulation as specified in RFC 2473 and RFC 4213:
- Protocol Number: 4 (IPv4) in IPv6 Next Header field
- No IPsec required: Plain encapsulation (though IPsec can be added)
- Stateless tunnel: No tunnel setup protocol needed
- MTU considerations: IPv6 header adds 20 bytes overhead
The AFTR: Address Family Transition Router
The AFTR is the cornerstone of DS-Lite architecture, combining two critical functions in a single device.
AFTR Functions
1. IPv4-in-IPv6 Tunnel Endpoint
- Terminates tunnels from thousands of B4 elements simultaneously
- Decapsulates incoming IPv6 packets to extract IPv4 traffic
- Encapsulates outbound IPv4 responses into IPv6 for return to B4
- Maintains mapping between B4 IPv6 addresses and tunnel sessions
2. Carrier-Grade NAT44 (CGNAT)
- Translates private IPv4 addresses to shared public IPv4 addresses
- Performs port-based address sharing (NAPT - Network Address Port Translation)
- Typical sharing ratio: 50-200 subscribers per public IPv4 address
- Maintains NAT binding tables for millions of concurrent sessions
- Implements logging for regulatory compliance (address + port + timestamp)
For more information on CGNAT limitations and challenges, see IPv6 Behind CGNAT.
AFTR Deployment Considerations
Capacity Planning:
- High-performance hardware required (dedicated appliances or high-end routers)
- Typical throughput: 10-100 Gbps depending on subscriber count
- Session capacity: millions of concurrent NAT translations
- Memory-intensive due to connection tracking tables
Redundancy:
- Critical single point of failure for IPv4 connectivity
- Typically deployed in active-active or active-standby configurations
- IPv6 anycast addresses enable automatic failover
- Session state synchronization between redundant AFTRs
Address Assignment:
- AFTR has a well-known IPv6 address
- Communicated to B4 via DHCPv6 Option 64 (RFC 6334)
- Can use anycast for load balancing across multiple AFTRs
IPv4 Address Pool:
- ISP allocates public IPv4 addresses for AFTR's NAT pool
- Addresses shared across many subscribers (port-based sharing)
- Typical allocation: /20 to /16 depending on subscriber count
The B4 Element: Basic Bridging BroadBand
The B4 element resides in the customer premises equipment (CPE) and handles the customer-side tunnel operations.
B4 Functions
1. Tunnel Client
- Creates IPv4-in-IPv6 tunnel to AFTR
- Discovers AFTR IPv6 address via DHCPv6 or static configuration
- Handles all IPv4 traffic from customer devices
2. IPv6 Addressing
- Receives global IPv6 address via SLAAC or DHCPv6
- Uses this address as tunnel source
- No IPv4 addressing on WAN interface (IPv6-only)
3. Customer Network Gateway
- Provides private IPv4 addressing to customer devices (RFC 1918)
- Runs DHCP server for customer devices
- May perform additional NAT44 locally (creating double-NAT scenario)
B4 Discovery Process
When a CPE with B4 capability connects to the network:
1. CPE connects to ISP network
2. Performs IPv6 autoconfiguration (SLAAC or DHCPv6)
3. Requests DHCPv6 Option 64 (AFTR-Name)
4. Resolves AFTR name to IPv6 address via DNS (AAAA record)
5. Establishes IPv4-in-IPv6 tunnel to AFTR
6. Begins forwarding customer IPv4 traffic through tunnel
B4 Implementation
B4 functionality can be implemented in:
- CPE routers: Firmware update or native support
- Gateway devices: ISP-provided equipment with DS-Lite built-in
- Operating systems: Software-based B4 on end-user devices
- Virtual routers: In virtualized network environments
ISP Use Cases: IPv4 Address Conservation
DS-Lite solves several critical problems for ISPs facing IPv4 address exhaustion.
Problem: IPv4 Address Scarcity
By 2025, IPv4 addresses have become a scarce commodity:
- Market price: $40-60 per IPv4 address
- RIR allocations: Exhausted in all regions except Africa
- Legacy networks: Require IPv4 for backward compatibility
- Dual-stack cost: Requires allocating IPv4 to every subscriber
DS-Lite Solution: Massive Address Sharing
Instead of allocating one public IPv4 address per subscriber, DS-Lite enables:
Traditional ISP Model (Dual-Stack):
10,000 subscribers = 10,000 public IPv4 addresses needed
Cost at $50/IP = $500,000 in IPv4 address acquisition
DS-Lite Model:
10,000 subscribers sharing 50-200 IPv4 addresses at AFTR
Address sharing ratio: 50-200 subscribers per IP
Cost at $50/IP = $2,500 - $10,000
Savings: $490,000 - $497,500 (98-99% reduction)
Additional ISP Benefits
1. IPv6-Native Infrastructure
- Access network and core run pure IPv6
- No dual-stack complexity in routing
- Simplified operations and reduced equipment costs
- Future-proof architecture ready for IPv6-only Internet
2. Centralized IPv4 Management
- All IPv4 NAT happens at AFTR (centralized control)
- Easier to implement policy, logging, and compliance
- Simpler troubleshooting (single point for IPv4 issues)
3. Greenfield Deployment Advantage
- New fiber networks can be IPv6-only from day one
- No legacy IPv4 infrastructure to maintain
- Lower CAPEX and OPEX
4. Gradual IPv4 Phase-Out
- Can reduce AFTR capacity as IPv6 adoption grows
- Eventually sunset AFTR entirely when IPv4 unnecessary
- Clear migration path to IPv6-only
Real-World Deployment Examples
DS-Lite has been deployed by major ISPs worldwide, particularly in Europe and Asia where IPv4 exhaustion hit earliest.
Europe
France:
- Free (ISP): One of the first major DS-Lite deployments (2010-2012)
- Deployed IPv6-only infrastructure on Freebox routers
- IPv4 services provided via DS-Lite
- Millions of subscribers successfully migrated
Germany:
- Deutsche Telekom: Deployed DS-Lite for DSL customers
- Provided DS-Lite as default for new customers
- Option to request native dual-stack (limited availability)
- Stadtwerke Flensburg: Fiber deployments using DS-Lite (as of 2024)
Netherlands:
- Multiple regional ISPs deployed DS-Lite for FTTH (Fiber-to-the-Home)
- Pure IPv6 access networks with centralized AFTR
Asia
Japan:
- Major mobile carriers (NTT DoCoMo, KDDI) deployed DS-Lite variants
- High IPv6 adoption rates made DS-Lite attractive
- Mobile networks particularly suited for IPv6-only access
China:
- China Telecom and China Mobile tested DS-Lite
- Large-scale deployments for broadband and mobile
- Critical for massive subscriber bases with limited IPv4
North America
- Smaller-scale deployments compared to Europe/Asia
- Some cable operators tested DS-Lite
- Preference for dual-stack with CGNAT (NAT444) in many cases
Key Success Factors
Deployments succeeded when ISPs:
- Provided compatible CPE: Updated firmware or supplied DS-Lite-capable routers
- Communicated clearly: Explained limitations to customers (port forwarding, etc.)
- Offered alternatives: Native dual-stack for users requiring full IPv4
- Provided fallback: IPv4-only service for incompatible equipment
Advantages of DS-Lite
DS-Lite offers several compelling advantages over alternative transition technologies.
1. IPv6-Native Core Network
Benefit: Eliminates dual-stack complexity in ISP infrastructure
- Routers and switches only need IPv6 support
- Simpler routing tables and configurations
- Lower equipment costs (single-stack devices)
- Reduced operational complexity
2. Massive IPv4 Address Conservation
Benefit: 50-200 subscribers share a single public IPv4 address
- 98-99% reduction in IPv4 addresses needed
- Huge cost savings ($40-60 per IPv4 address avoided)
- Extends IPv4 service availability despite exhaustion
- Makes IPv4 acquisition costs manageable
3. Avoids NAT444 Problems
Benefit: Single NAT layer instead of double NAT
Unlike NAT444 (CGNAT with customer CPE NAT), DS-Lite:
- Uses only AFTR NAT (customer NAT optional)
- Avoids double-NAT connectivity issues
- Better application compatibility
- Simpler troubleshooting
4. Cleaner Than Dual-Stack with CGNAT
Comparison with Dual-Stack + CGNAT:
| Aspect |
DS-Lite |
Dual-Stack + CGNAT |
| Core Network |
IPv6-only |
Dual-stack required |
| Access Network |
IPv6-only |
Dual-stack required |
| IPv4 to Customer |
Via tunnel |
Native |
| NAT Layers |
1 (AFTR only) |
1-2 (CGNAT + optional CPE) |
| Infrastructure Cost |
Lower (single stack) |
Higher (dual stack) |
| Future-Proof |
Yes (IPv6 native) |
No (IPv4 dependencies) |
5. Works with Existing Applications
Benefit: Transparent to end-user applications
- IPv4 applications function normally on customer devices
- No application modifications required
- Users continue to use private IPv4 addresses (RFC 1918)
- DNS resolution works as expected (A and AAAA records)
6. Simple Tunnel Protocol
Benefit: Stateless encapsulation without complex signaling
- No tunnel setup protocol required
- Lightweight encapsulation overhead (20 bytes)
- Scales to millions of tunnels from single AFTR
- No encryption overhead (unless IPsec added)
Limitations and Trade-offs
While DS-Lite solves critical problems, it introduces limitations that users and ISPs must understand.
1. CPE Replacement or Upgrade Required
Impact: Customer equipment must support DS-Lite
- Problem: Existing routers likely don't support DS-Lite
- Solutions:
- Firmware update (if available)
- ISP-provided CPE with built-in B4
- Customer purchases compatible router
- Cost: Equipment replacement expense for ISP or customer
- User friction: Customers resist equipment changes
This is often cited as the biggest barrier to DS-Lite deployment.
2. Port Forwarding Broken
Impact: Inbound connections from Internet impossible for most users
- Why: Shared public IPv4 address with port-based NAT
- Affected uses:
- Hosting servers (web, game, file sharing)
- Peer-to-peer applications
- Remote access (VPN, SSH from outside)
- Some gaming (requires specific ports)
- IoT devices requiring inbound access
- Solutions:
- Use IPv6 for inbound connections (if supported)
- Request dedicated IPv4 from ISP (if available, often costly)
- Use relay services or VPN tunnels
3. Application Compatibility Issues
Impact: Some applications break with CGNAT
- VPN protocols: Some IPsec implementations fail through NAT
- Gaming: Strict NAT type limits multiplayer functionality
- SIP/VoIP: May require ALG (Application Layer Gateway) at AFTR
- FTP active mode: Broken without AFTR ALG support
- Peer-to-peer: BitTorrent, WebRTC may have degraded performance
4. Carrier-Grade NAT Logging Requirements
Impact: Privacy and regulatory compliance complexity
- Legal requirement: Many jurisdictions require logging NAT translations
- What's logged: Source IP/port, public IP/port, timestamp, destination
- Data volume: Massive (millions of flows per second)
- Storage: Terabytes per day for large ISPs
- Privacy concerns: ISP maintains detailed connection records
- Compliance: GDPR and similar regulations add complexity
5. Increased Latency
Impact: Additional processing delay from tunneling and NAT
- Tunnel overhead: Encapsulation/decapsulation at B4 and AFTR
- NAT processing: CGNAT lookup and translation at AFTR
- Typical impact: 5-20ms additional latency
- Gaming impact: Noticeable in latency-sensitive applications
- Mitigation: High-performance AFTR hardware, optimized placement
6. MTU Fragmentation Issues
Impact: IPv6 encapsulation reduces effective MTU
- Standard Ethernet MTU: 1500 bytes
- IPv6 header overhead: 20 bytes (IPv6 adds 20 bytes vs IPv4)
- Effective IPv4 MTU in tunnel: 1480 bytes
- Problems:
- Path MTU Discovery (PMTUD) must work correctly
- Some applications assume 1500 byte MTU
- Fragmentation if PMTUD fails
- Solution: ISPs may use jumbo frames (MTU >1500) on infrastructure
7. AFTR as Single Point of Failure
Impact: AFTR outage breaks IPv4 for all subscribers
- Risk: Centralized architecture creates critical dependency
- Mitigation: Redundant AFTRs with anycast, session synchronization
- Cost: High-availability AFTR deployments are expensive
End-User Implications
Understanding DS-Lite helps users diagnose connectivity issues and make informed decisions.
What Users Experience
Normal Functionality:
- Web browsing (HTTP/HTTPS) works normally
- Email, instant messaging, video streaming function correctly
- Most modern applications work fine
- IPv6 connectivity is native and unaffected
Limited or Broken Functionality:
- Cannot host public-facing servers (web, game, FTP)
- Port forwarding on router has no effect
- Strict NAT type in gaming consoles
- Some P2P applications struggle with connectivity
- Remote access from Internet requires workarounds
How to Detect DS-Lite
Indicators you're on DS-Lite:
- Router shows IPv6 WAN address only (no IPv4 WAN address)
- Router admin panel shows "DS-Lite" or "IPv4-over-IPv6"
- Multiple devices show same public IPv4 when checking WhatIsMyIP.com
- Port forwarding fails to make services accessible from Internet
- traceroute shows IPv6 hops even when accessing IPv4 destinations
Testing DS-Lite:
# Check if your router's WAN interface has IPv4
# If only IPv6 present, likely DS-Lite
# From customer device:
curl -4 ifconfig.me # Shows shared public IPv4
curl -6 ifconfig.me # Shows your unique IPv6
# Compare with another user on same ISP
# If IPv4 address identical, you're sharing via CGNAT/DS-Lite
When DS-Lite is Problematic
Use cases where DS-Lite causes issues:
- Home servers/labs: Cannot accept inbound connections
- Remote workers: VPN and remote desktop may struggle
- Gamers: Strict NAT limits multiplayer, can't host games
- Smart home: IoT devices requiring cloud access may fail
- Surveillance cameras: Remote viewing requires relay services
Solutions:
- Request native dual-stack: Ask ISP if available (may cost extra)
- Use IPv6: Configure services for IPv6 if applications support it
- Tunnel broker: Obtain dedicated IPv4 via tunnel (HE TunnelBroker, etc.)
- Cloud relay: Use Cloudflare Tunnel, ngrok, or similar services
- VPS as jump host: Rent VPS with public IPv4 for reverse proxy/tunnel
When DS-Lite is Acceptable
Use cases where DS-Lite works fine:
- Casual browsing and content consumption
- Streaming video (Netflix, YouTube, etc.)
- Email and productivity applications
- Most modern games (client-side, not hosting)
- IPv6-enabled services (preferred anyway)
DS-Lite vs Other Transition Technologies
DS-Lite is one of several approaches to managing IPv4 exhaustion. Understanding the alternatives helps evaluate trade-offs.
DS-Lite vs NAT444
NAT444: CGNAT at ISP plus customer CPE NAT (double NAT)
| Aspect |
DS-Lite |
NAT444 |
| Core Network |
IPv6-only |
Dual-stack |
| NAT Layers |
1 (AFTR) |
2 (CGNAT + CPE) |
| CPE Requirement |
DS-Lite support |
Standard NAT router |
| Infrastructure Cost |
Lower |
Higher |
| Application Compatibility |
Better |
Worse (double NAT issues) |
| Port Forwarding |
Broken |
Broken |
| Deployment Barrier |
CPE upgrade |
None (uses existing CPE) |
Winner: DS-Lite for greenfield deployments; NAT444 for legacy networks
DS-Lite vs 464XLAT
464XLAT: IPv6-only network with customer-side IPv4 synthesis
| Aspect |
DS-Lite |
464XLAT |
| IPv4 Packets |
Tunneled (IPv4-in-IPv6) |
Translated (NAT46/NAT64) |
| Stateful Component |
AFTR (central) |
PLAT (central) + CLAT (customer) |
| IPv6 Preference |
IPv4 tunneled, IPv6 native |
IPv6 preferred, IPv4 synthesized |
| Application View |
Sees IPv4 addresses |
Sees IPv4 addresses (synthesized) |
| Performance |
Tunnel overhead |
Translation overhead |
| Complexity |
Moderate |
Higher |
Winner: 464XLAT for mobile networks; DS-Lite for fixed broadband
DS-Lite vs Native Dual-Stack
Native Dual-Stack: Every subscriber gets both IPv4 and IPv6
| Aspect |
DS-Lite |
Native Dual-Stack |
| IPv4 Addresses Needed |
50-200 subscribers per IP |
1 subscriber per IP |
| Cost |
Low (IPv4 sharing) |
High (IPv4 per user) |
| Application Compatibility |
Limited (no port forwarding) |
Full (native IPv4) |
| Infrastructure |
IPv6-only core |
Dual-stack everywhere |
| Future-Proof |
Yes |
No (IPv4 dependencies) |
| User Experience |
Some limitations |
Best |
Winner: Dual-stack for user experience; DS-Lite for cost and future-proofing
DS-Lite vs Lightweight 4over6 (lw4o6)
lw4o6: Extension of DS-Lite with port-set allocation
| Aspect |
DS-Lite |
Lightweight 4over6 |
| Port Allocation |
Dynamic (CGNAT) |
Static (pre-assigned) |
| AFTR State |
Stateful (millions of flows) |
Stateless (mapping only) |
| Port Forwarding |
Broken |
Works (within assigned ports) |
| Scalability |
Good |
Excellent |
| Complexity |
Moderate |
Higher |
Winner: lw4o6 for advanced deployments needing port forwarding
Testing Your DS-Lite Connection
Verifying whether you're on DS-Lite and how well it performs is critical for troubleshooting.
Check Your Connectivity Type
Use test-ipv6.run for comprehensive testing:
The tool performs:
- IPv4-only connectivity test: Checks if you can reach IPv4-only sites
- IPv6-only connectivity test: Checks if you can reach IPv6-only sites
- Dual-stack test: Verifies sites with both A and AAAA records
- Latency measurements: Compares IPv4 vs IPv6 performance
- Protocol preference detection: Determines which protocol your browser prefers
What test-ipv6.run reveals about DS-Lite:
- IPv4 connectivity: Should succeed (via DS-Lite tunnel)
- IPv6 connectivity: Should succeed (native)
- IPv4 latency: May be slightly higher than IPv6 (tunnel overhead)
- Dual-stack preference: Should prefer IPv6 when available
- Broken IPv6: Should NOT show (if broken, indicates misconfiguration)
Manual Testing
Test IPv4 connectivity:
# Check your public IPv4 (will be shared with other users)
curl -4 ifconfig.me
curl -4 icanhazip.com
# Traceroute to see IPv6 hops even for IPv4 destination
traceroute -4 8.8.8.8
# If you see IPv6 addresses in trace, likely DS-Lite
Test IPv6 connectivity:
# Check your public IPv6 (unique to you)
curl -6 ifconfig.me
curl -6 icanhazip.com
# Ping IPv6-only site
ping6 ipv6.google.com
Check for CGNAT:
# If your router's WAN IP is in these ranges, you're behind CGNAT:
# 100.64.0.0/10 (RFC 6598 - Shared Address Space)
# Or your WAN shows only IPv6 (DS-Lite indicator)
Interpreting Results
Normal DS-Lite:
- IPv4 works but uses shared public address
- IPv6 works with unique global address
- IPv4 may show slightly higher latency
- Cannot accept inbound IPv4 connections
Broken DS-Lite:
- IPv4 connectivity fails or times out
- IPv6 works normally
- test-ipv6.run shows "broken IPv6" or connectivity errors
- Indicates CPE or AFTR misconfiguration
Not DS-Lite (Native Dual-Stack):
- IPv4 shows unique public address (not shared)
- IPv6 shows unique public address
- Similar latency for both protocols
- Port forwarding works
Conclusion
DS-Lite represents a pragmatic solution to one of the Internet's most pressing challenges: providing IPv4 services in an IPv6 world while conserving increasingly scarce IPv4 addresses.
Key Takeaways
For ISPs:
- DS-Lite enables IPv6-only infrastructure while maintaining IPv4 service
- Massive cost savings through IPv4 address sharing (98-99% reduction)
- Future-proof architecture ready for IPv6-only Internet
- Trade-off: CPE compatibility and customer limitations
For End Users:
- Most applications work normally under DS-Lite
- Hosting servers and port forwarding become impossible
- IPv6 connectivity is native and preferred
- Users requiring full IPv4 may need to request alternative service
Technical Reality:
- DS-Lite is well-standardized (RFC 6333) and widely deployed
- Successful deployments in Europe, Asia, and globally
- Critical technology bridging IPv4 exhaustion and IPv6 adoption
- Eventually superseded by pure IPv6 as ecosystem matures
The Path Forward
As IPv6 adoption accelerates globally, DS-Lite serves as a transitional technology enabling ISPs to move to IPv6-native infrastructure without abandoning IPv4 service. The ultimate goal remains an IPv6-only Internet where technologies like DS-Lite become obsolete—but until that day arrives, DS-Lite provides a cost-effective, scalable bridge.
Want to verify your network's IPv6 readiness and check if you're on DS-Lite? Visit test-ipv6.run for comprehensive, browser-based testing of your IPv4 and IPv6 connectivity. The tool runs all tests directly in your browser, provides real-time results, and scores your IPv6 readiness—helping you understand exactly how your connection works.
Additional Resources